...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Genome-wide ancestry of 17th-century enslaved Africans from the Caribbean
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] I don't understand what you are talking about in relation to Sahelian-Sudanic people, or even Bantu people among AAs in relation to R1. There were very few Sahelian-Sudani people sold into slavery in the Caribbean and Thirteen Colonies of the United States. The vast majority of the African slaves in the U.S., and Caribbean came from Cameroon, India, Mozambique the Senegambian and Guinea. It was hard to reconcile the presence of R1 among Black Native Americans and AAs because the majority of Blacks did not come from the Sahelian-Sahara region, where many Blacks carry R1. Everything changed with publication of "The genetic landscape of Equatorial Guinea and the origin and migration routes of the Y chromosome haplogroup R-V88", by Gonzalez et al.Gonzalez et al , made it clear R1 was found in Equatorial Guinea , and they argued that R1 probably spread across Europe from Iberia to the east given the distribution of R1 in Africa. Since the vast majority of the slaves in the 13 colonies came from this part of Africa it explained the high frequency of R1 among AAs. [IMG]http://olmec98.net/m269.png[/IMG] The presence of R1 in West africa explains the discovery or R1 among the Zoutsteeg individuals, and AAs in the Caribbean and the United States. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3