...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Did humans interbreed in Cameroon
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] Clean that prism……..!!!! To the newbies. To summarize. What the author is saying is that Paabo and Greene were WRONG. There was no Neanderthal admixture with AMH. It is only a romantic(delusion) within the minds of Europeans that quickly gained popularity when it was published. Paabo and Greene LIED!!! Quotes : --- In view of this I decided to conduct a series of tests aimed at [b]distinguishing between Neanderthal introgression[/b] and mutation slowdown. Crucially, the mutation slowdown model makes a range of predictions that can be used to [b]help distinguish it FROM introgression[/b]. Perhaps unexpectedly, in every test I applied the mutation slowdown model [b]offers a better, often unambiguously better, fit to the data than the Neanderthal introgression model[/b]. My results therefore appear to be [b]at odds with previous studies[/b], a conflict that can be resolved in three main ways. First, my analyses are constrained both by the populations covered by the 1000 genomes project, which do not include representatives from Oceania, and refer mainly to broad patterns linked to Neanderthals. As such, they have no particular implications either for the[b] Denisovan ***story*** 26, nor for *****anecdotal***** observations of specific individuals [/b]or genes. Indeed, evidence for occasional interbreeding events seems rather strong and, if the resulting offspring survived and bred QUOTE: Conclusions. The idea of widespread interbreeding between modern humans and other hominids has been [b]broadly and rapidly accepted[/b], I am sure in part because the idea of carrying their legacy is [b]undeniably romantic[/b]. Another key element is that, so far, a plausible alternative hypothesis has not been available. Mounting evidence in favour of HI offers an alternative explanation for many or most of the observations used to infer introgression, from differential patterns of base sharing to changes in apparent block size. The HI-mediated mutation slowdown hypothesis fits better with a range of direct tests of fit in which opposing predictions of the two hypotheses are compared. Consequently, there is now a clear need to explain why mutation slowdown is so strongly favoured before the idea of a [b]widespread Neanderthal legacy can be considered proven[/b]. ------- Read more: http://egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/search/results?captcha_id=captcha_search&display_as=0&search=Search&what_at_least_one=Neanderthal&who_at_least_one=19#ixzz4lJ9hsGUy Read more: http://egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/search/results?captcha_id=captcha_search&display_as=0&search=Search&what_at_least_one=Neanderthal&who_at_least_one=19#ixzz4lJ9YsqI6 Read more: http://egyptsearchreloaded.proboards.com/search/results?captcha_id=captcha_search&display_as=0&search=Search&what_at_least_one=Neanderthal&who_at_least_one=19#ixzz4lJ9P3pKn [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3