...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
R-V88 from where…really ?– new study
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] I find •[i]f[/i]3 stat < -0.0025 has little significance • it improbable Yoruba-like and over 50 different Eurasian-like populations met mingled and mated in either Chad or Ethiopia. Where's any anthropology archaeology mythos etc in support of something so absurd? I don't think the checks they put in place to weed out African genomes in the non-Africans did the job. All it did was maybe weed out very recent African input. The initial OoA genomes didn't poof all vacate the premises. They remained in Africa with the Africans who didn't go anywhere except other places in Continental Africa. I'm too dim to see any other way • Pleistocene Ust Ishim and Oceanics • pre-Holocene 1st Americans • modern day Cochin Jews all got it on with Yoruba and out popped Tubu and Amhara. I mean, show me two other studies with • 165 Ref1 pops • all with negative [i]f[/i] stats • and Z less than -4. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3