...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
R-V88 from where…really ?– new study
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] Then you could say that about any population without even running any tests. Stay woke, geneticists creeping Gon find you, catch you sleeping Don't you close your eyes Afaik the guy who invented F3 and F4 is explicit in saying negative F3 stats with Z less than -4 mean there was admixture between Ref1 and Ref2 regarding X. Even Haber's Chad report gives instances of positive f stat or greater than -4 Z (Gumuz). I got no problem with his MALDER. At least it's got non-genetic support in an historic timeframe. Don't want to get into his eurocentrism yet it certainly's there in talk like "Yoruba splitting from Eurasians" or "a Non African component from East Africa" Anyway I still want to see corroboration in the form of two more reports with 160 Ref1 pops spanning time from the Pleistocene to 1000 years ago and one Ref2 modern pop, all with neg f3 stat and and Z less than -4. I'm not buying a truncated published list excuse. That's just an unwarranted supposition afaic. Meanwhile, show me any Anthropologie archaeology or Mythos, anything, in support of Tubu (currently less than a million of them) extensive mixing before Sea Peoples Punics Garamantes aGreeks or Romans 'facilitated' such a thing. The Tubu are Kanuri people. Leave them be from Semitic Ethiopians. Similarity of hair and shape of face be damned. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3