...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
What's the difference between genome-wide data and mitochondrial genomes?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] That is why it is important to look at BOTH uniparental markers and autosomal markers. And NOT ONLY frequency of autosomal markers. Uniparental provides is the best indication of DIRECTION of migration. Of course in recent admixed populations like Obama's kids and yours. The story is incomplete when only considering autosomal makers. Interesting you said that West Africans carry "sub-clades" of L3f found in East Africa. I have no proof of that but that is again indicative of there being no such thing as a Bantu Expansion. That is why the FREQUENCY nonsense in the New Kingdom mummies is a slieght of hands. Deep analysis is needed to determine migration route, frequency cannot tells us anything, and they know it that is why the paper is written like that. . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3