...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
What's the difference between genome-wide data and mitochondrial genomes?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: Two thirds of the sample in the study were individual mummies of people who were the descendants of the Greeks, Romans and Turks that drove many Egyptians into Nubia and West Africa. Given the sample of mummies of non-Egyptian origin in the study it was natural that the mummies would possess non-African DNA [/QUOTE]Clyde, stop making up stuff What is this non-African DNA you are talking about ? what haplogroups? [/qb][/QUOTE]This would be the haplogroups carried by the Turks, Greco-Romans and etc. skeletons, beginning with the Ptolemaic period of Egypt. Click on the following video: . [URL=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4EHE-5E7AlY] [IMG]https://i.ytimg.com/vi/4EHE-5E7AlY/hqdefault.jpg[/IMG][/URL] . [/qb][/QUOTE][QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: The C-Group founded the Kerma dynasty of Kush. The Temehus or C-Group people began to settle Kush around 2200 BC. [/QUOTE] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: blacks carry Eurasian DNA because the first Eurasians were black Kushite. [/QUOTE]So Eurasia was not populated until after 2200 BC ? The video says blacks carry Eurasian DNA because the first Eurasians were black Kushites. If the first Eurasians were black Kushites why would they be carrying Eurasian DNA? They would be carrying African DNA And if for 2/3 of the mummies it was [b]"natural that the mummies would possess non-African DNA" --Clyde Winters[/b] what is the non-African haplogroups you are referring to? The video does does not state which haplogroups are the non-Kushite aka non-African DNA [/qb][/QUOTE]LOL. The Kushites carried so-called Eurasian genes because they were the Eurasians who took these genes from the Levant into Eurasia. This is especially true of the R1 clade. Eurocentrists confuse the origin of the CHG and EF populations in Europe. The African Y-Chromosomes R1b1 and R1b1a is called R-L278 and R-L754/L761 respectively , while Europeans carrying these clades are simply referred to as R1b1 and R1b1a. Eurocentrists do this to make it appear the these clades do not exist in Africa and promote the idea that R-V88 is of non-African origin. . [IMG]http://olmec98.net/ydnaR1_1.png[/IMG] . Mal'ta man belonged to the R1 clade. The First Europeans in Italy (14kya) and Samara were R1b1a and R1b1. See: http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=18;t=000045 . [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3