...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
What's the difference between genome-wide data and mitochondrial genomes?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: The Kushites carried so-called Eurasian genes because they were the Eurasians who took these genes from the Levant into Eurasia. [/QUOTE] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: Two thirds of the sample in the study were individual mummies of people who were the descendants of the Greeks, Romans and Turks that drove many Egyptians into Nubia and West Africa. Given the sample of mummies of non-Egyptian origin in the study it was natural that the mummies would possess non-African DNA [/QUOTE]So Greek and Roman DNA is non-African Kushite DNA. So which haplogroups are these? [/qb][/QUOTE]It would be R1 clades. Epigravettian culture context in Italy (Villabruna) who lived circa 12,000 BC belonged to R1b1a, which is primarilly found in Africa. [/qb][/QUOTE]You said given the sample of 2/3 mummies of non-Egyptian origin in the study it was natural that the mummies would possess non-African DNA so if R1b1a is primarily found in Africa what haplogroups are the non-African haplogroups of the 2/3 mummies ? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3