...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
What's the difference between genome-wide data and mitochondrial genomes?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ish Gebor: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: As usual Lioness trying to confuse the unsuspecting and novice reader. Will someone explain to HIM that what he posted corroborates my point. He is comparing apples and oranges. Yes, West African/AFRAMs carry more mtDNA L than MZabs, but these are uniparental markers passed from mothers to offsprings and continued through the daughters, but autosomal STR confirms that geographically the MZabs are more African than West Africans/AFRAMS and are more distant to North Europeans. That means the MZab has existed in Africa longer than maybe modern West Africans. The length of branch indicates they have been isolated for a very long time. This also supports the view that their lineage is indigenous as supported by Kefi et al. [b]Over 22,000years ago mtDNA H existed in Africa BEFORE entry as Neolithic Europeans (6000years ago). There was never any back-migration and Europeans are a subset of Africans. [/b] Holistically SNPs are useless. Without the appropriate tool such as TReeMix. [/QUOTE]Yep! [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] "Back in the day" their game was statistical manipulation of FREQUENCY of uniparental markers. same game, different dataset [/qb][/QUOTE]True! [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3