...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
What's the difference between genome-wide data and mitochondrial genomes?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] BS on all 3 counts. You are blowing smoke. I posted these Abusir HG are found as far as Tanzania and they are UPSTREAM clades ...WTF. Why couldn't they Abusir HG come from Great Lake Again? What is your argument? They are still found in Great Lakes region. R0 and M1 is still found in Africa. M1 is found from theShores of the Red Sea to Islands off Nigeria ...WT.... The STR argument IS relevant. Because it shows GEOGRAPHICAL affinity unlike SNP which is really SHARED ancestry. What are you smoking bruh??!! You got some bad weed.! [QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [Q] Going back to the previous page, [b]@Xyyman[/b], is it necessary to dismiss one approach when using another? - Those haplogroups found in abusir el meleq couldn't have possibly came from inner Africa, it's impossible... -Sometimes it feel like you forget that their are **haplogroups upstream***, that till this day haven't been found on the continent. **The STR argument kinda irrelevant** as it doesn't directly contradict anything recently discussed. Matterfact, see Tukuler North African thread. [/QB][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3