...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Europeans have different Neolithic ancestry than South Asians
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] Quote: I knew Basal Eurasian/EEF was from Africa. But when I first read the digest several years ago I missed that part when they implied that ANE/WHG?ENA were separated from Basal Eurasian also ....in Africa. [IMG]http://i66.tinypic.com/a428pd.jpg[/IMG] From DNATribes: Quote: Sequential analyses of non-local genetic components in Europe using both autosomal STR and SNP data express ancestral components related to Middle Eastern and North Eurasian populations. [b]Subsequent steps [/b]in each iterative analysis reveal deeper genetic relationships to populations of the[b] Indian Subcontinent and Horn of Africa[/b], possibly related to Early European Farmer (EEF) populations that first emerged near the Fertile Crescent as a synthesis integrating migratory hunter-gatherer and sedentary cultures from West Eurasia (possibly Anatolia) within [b]Basal Eurasian populations (possibly the Nile Valley).[/b] Results are also consistent with a [b]third element[/b] that helped shape European genetic structure: North Eurasian ancestry, related to not only West Asian (Mesopotamian and Caucasus Mountains) populations, but also to Siberian, Native American, and (in later iterations that show deeper relationships) to Asian-Pacific populations. This might reflect contacts between European (WHG) and Siberian (ANE) hunter-gather populations and Eastern Non-African (ENA) populations during the Paleolithic and Mesolithic period, in which [b]Basal Eurasians were geographically separated from Eurasia (possibly near the Nile Valley).[/b] As new data become available, including new ancient genomes, it might become possible to further clarify these models of early population history and reveal new insights about the ancestral populations that shaped world genetic structure in Africa, Eurasia, Oceania, and the Americas. http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=009625;p=1#000000 [/qb][/QUOTE]The Mota article revealed the true origins of Eurasians when the researchers reported that West,East and South Africans carried West Asian haplogroups. The Harvard mob led by Reich, had the authors of the Mota article declare their findings were incorrect about the presence of West Asian admixture in Africans. They would have got away with this deception ,except, for the recent Haber et al article which showed that the Touboo and other Central Africans carried the same genes as the early Europeans and Anatolians, who were primarily descendants of the Kushites. We knows that there was never a migration of Eurasians into Central Africa, but there were African migrations, supported by archaeological and artefactual evidence that originated in Africa, but carried by Africans into Anatolia and Iberia. It was the Kushites that spread haplogroups: R, J and G. The model is already clear. Haplogroup R, was first introduced into Eurasia by the Khoisan. The Kushites reintroduced Y-Chromosome R, and other so-called Eurasian haplogroups. This is supported by the Weni Inscription that makes it clear the Kushites lived in both Lower and Upper Egypt, the Fezzan and Anatolia. As a result, they called themselves Heqe Khas – Ruler of Kushites. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3