...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Europeans have different Neolithic ancestry than South Asians
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] You guys are the expert on crania and morphology. But if what is stated is true then the genetics aligns with the crania studies. Sergi suggested the early Indus people were from the Nile Valley(Africa) also. DNATribes analyzed the EEF/Basal Eurasian(which is from Neolithic Africa) suggested they are also responsible for the Indus Valley Civilization. The genetics aligns with the morphology!! BTW - Size of population is insignificant. There more Chinese people in the world than Africans yet Africans are substantially more diverse and where humanity evolved. We are now concluding that the FEATURES and people are indeed African. Can't wait for the DNA of the Harrapan peoples come out. It was supposed to be released several months ago. Quote: So-called "negrito" peoples in India are [b]BUT a tiny minority SCATTERED[/b] in very rural areas of Southern India. The people of the Indus were never described as "negrito" though interestingly scholars like Keith and Buxton say they bear a resemblance to early [b]Mesopotamian crania [/b]in Kish and Al-Ubaid and other scholars like Morant and Stoessiger even say they had resemblances to[b] early Nile Valley crania due to certain features like dolichophally and prognathism[/b]. Of course in your mind such features equates to African but you're just as erroneous as those Euronuts who say those same features are Asiatic. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3