...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
They are inventing Multiregionalism-in-Africa
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] I still don't get what point you are trying to make. You are agreeing with me. THEY ARE NOT ANCESTRAL TO ONE ANOTHER THE ARE PARAGROUPS/SIBLINGS/PARACLADES. Would you stop your childish tantrum!! And pissing contest! [/qb][/QUOTE]You are misusing the term "Paraclade and Paragroups". The term "Paraclade" or "Paragroup" denotes the Ancestral state "*" and the parental phylogeny in reference to the most recent common ancestor. WAY back, 10 years ago, at low resolution YES, we thought that Southern Africans carried the same "Paraclade" / Ancestral lineage as Horn Africans (E-M35*) hence they would be ancestral to Berber's E-M81. With more resolution this is not the case. You cannot say "PARAGROUPS/SIBLINGS/PARACLADES" because 2 of them mean the same thing while "Siblings" is mutually exclusive of other two. Why are you still saying they are siblings? This is NOT semantics. And if you knew this infomration you wouldny make the argument you are making in reference to South African Haplogroup E. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3