...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Vedic Origins of the Europeans: the Children of Danu (Questions)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by coolnight: [QB] ''Reich et al,claims that the Indian Cline divides Indians into two groups Ancestral North Indians (ANI) and Ancestral South Indians (ANS). The ANI are related to western Eurasians and speak Indo-Euopean languages. The ANS on the otherhand speak Dravidian languages.'' yes but I have read ths ANI/ASI were not a singluar group but ANI encompasses a number of tribes/groups who were likely closely genetically related. I read the europeans fit into the ANI. The ASI I read were ethnically distinct from ANI and not related to any other group outside the subcontinent. I have read the ASI being connected/related to the Onga/Jarawa tribe/Andaman Islanders. However someone I have interacted with who shared the same ancestry as me has claimed because there DNA test shows no Melanesians/ Australoid inputs they believe the ASI theory to be a myth, In other words they believe there ancestors were not related to the Onga//Andaman Islanders. They have told me that feel that Reich et al is basically promoting a fraud theory/claim. South Asia is large region maybe the ASI people were not a singular ethnically homogeneous group. Maybe all south asians do not share the same ancestors under the ASI group. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3