...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancient Tanzanian Pastoralist results... VERY interesting stuff!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [QB] [QUOTE][b]Originally posted by capra:[/b] Huh, I got nothing. Sometimes a list of D stats makes more sense to me than a qpGraph.[/QUOTE]true, but having all is even better. However, if we really think about it, [i] "These results could be explained by migration into Africa from descendants of pre-pottery Levantine farmers or [b]alternatively by a scenario in which both pre-pottery Levantine farmers and Tanzania_Luxmanda_ 3100BP descend from a common ancestral population that lived thousands of years earlier in Africa or the Near East.[/b]"[/i] -Skoglund 2017 I didn't see any reason for this postulation elaborated on in the study, luxmanda wasn't in any of the skeleton graphs either. The road block here is; Luxmanda will always fit between a contemporary non Admixed E.African (like Mota) and Levant_N... so how would we go about distinguishing whether Luxmanda is ancestral and to what degree, for instance 85% upsteam and 15% recombined from PPNB, which is a possibility. [QUOTE]So you can't put Mota 100% upstream of Bari, is Bari actually closer to South African then? [/QUOTE]I Absolutely cannot... I'm thinking about A-M13 though, and what that Haplogroup can imply about pre-mota or even pre-PN2 population structure in east and Saharan Africa. I don't believe Nilotes are more San-like than Mota though. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3