...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Canary Island ancient DNA
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by capra: In the [b]D stats vs Sardinians the Guanches are closest to Shaigi_WGA, who I understand (from Anthrogenica) are Sudanese Arabs. These look very North African considering they are supposed to be a mix of Arabs and Nubians![/b] Maybe the Shaigi_WGA, or these particular examples at least, are Arabized Berbers? [/QUOTE]...is, ....is this GG's? [QUOTE]Too bad there aren't any statistics really looking at the source and proportion of the SSA. Looks like it is almost all incorporated into the Mozabite component. At any rate it ought to pre-date the almighty Arab slave trade. [/QUOTE]That source is prehistoric lol, I'm pretty sure Nilotes or a similar population will body the Guanche SSAn component... It's the same "east African" found in modern North Africa, it's the same "east African" in Abusir mummies, and PPNB... It's probably proof of our incompetence and hive minded judgment in referring to this membership as Sub-Saharan, when it might just be everything else, like ancient North African Shared with other Africans.... who knows? speculation aside I think here needs to be more transparency in how these papers are marketed, If there is marked European and Arab admixture in contemporary Berbers and these samples, it needs to be realized. Not everyone will know that these genomes aren't particularly representative of Aboriginal N.African populations. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3