...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Canary Island ancient DNA
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [QB] anywho I'm dumping this here, since I have no reason to sit on it. in simple terms, Its a low coverage dataset [b]biased towards [i]African[/i] variation[/b]... some people might find some of these distributions interesting. new Guanche populations included... They're moreless equivalent to how they're described in the study..To reiterate. The SSA admixture is best fitted with east African Bantu populations and occasionally nilotes... unlike most North africans, No additional West African signals, and the lack of 600ya pemba Tanzanian signals edges me to believe that the Guanche folks probably had cushitic-like or E.AfricanHG SSA Affinity... They're definitely more "Eurasian" than other North Africans. K7 is the best statistically, click to expand. [URL=https://postimg.cc/image/24p97i9akr/] [IMG]https://s1.postimg.cc/24p97i9akr/Gun_K4-13.png[/IMG][/URL] Here's a raw [URL=https://drive.google.com/file/d/0Bzi0D1lrmvbEbnJuTm1ibVM2YXM/view?usp=sharing]searchable PDF[/URL] for easy viewing by every K. Might convince a friend to upload samples to gedmatch if anyone here cares about it. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3