...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
IAM population, Natufians, Proto-Semitic, North African Component
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Oshun: [QB] What does it matter what they say? For one lets just be honest and give voice to the only real reason they care: race. Proving someone isn't black isn't the same as proving someone isn't African. Blacks have far more physical and genetic diversity. So the burden of proof is higher to prove they're not, if we're dealing with lowkey racist "Egyptologists." Other than that, if the time period is off it really doesn't matter. If the debate is what group was responsible for state formation then you'll need to be focusing on the people of Nekhen, Naqada and Abydos. The three proto states that were the main players in the process of Egyptian unification. It's possible Ta Seti and Nekhen were very closely connected with one another, and I'd also like to see what people have to say about Naqada and Abydos, hence the thread I made. The question will likely boil down ultimately to these three proto Egyptian states. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3