...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
IAM population, Natufians, Proto-Semitic, North African Component
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by capra: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: With a lot of African aDNA papers, we get very limited analysis. A lot of them have little "replay value" or observations you can come back to and compare in light of future findings. There is a big difference between aDNA teams when it comes to creativity and thoroughness with analyses, with some teams really leading and standing out. But we'll see if they'll fix certain things in the published paper. That weird 12.000 year old backmigration claim (which wasn't actually what their source, Henn et al, said), is one thing in a long list, that should be fixed. I'm also looking forward to an investigation into why IAM is pulled away from the closest Eurasian samples, and in what (African) direction. But I don't think that will be forthcoming. They seem very satisfied leaving it at "12ky backmigration". [/QUOTE]Yeah,[b] I was rather disappointed with what we got in the preprint.[/b] I suppose we can't expect all aDNA papers to come with a detailed hundred page supplement. :) But even if they don't add to the published paper, the genomes will be out there. [/QB][/QUOTE]What were you most disappointed with? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3