...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
IAM population, Natufians, Proto-Semitic, North African Component
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [QB] Have anyone as of lately approached these concepts using their understanding/findings or interpretation of linguistics? I remember seeing a poster (Asar Imhotep iirc) hypothesize that Semitic is a result of convergence in south west Asia of African languages and some I.E. precursor... I liked that Idea in particular though I wasn't a fan of the Negro-Egyptian model... It brought to mind what Joseph Yahuda done, as well as his comments on the relationships between Afrasan(Semitic) and I.E. Genetically speaking I find it odd how underrepresented certain OOA correspondences would be in Omotic samples including Mota... realistically, there isn't much space between Gumuz-Mota and other populations in the region, particularly pre-proto-Cushitic speakers after 15kya to develop OOA affinity before expansion... or maybe OOA elements simply back-migrated around that time period testament to M1 and later R1 only to be recombined in the levant 6-5kya? regardless these explanations will have to get real exotic. It seems most (including myself sometimes) often settle for the parsimonious explanations, though human history can't be explained by one or two events.... However using A.Asiatic languages as an indicator for population history in this case feels real messy. Don't forget that even Keita (2015) suggested that the Aforementioned east African groups diverged well after OOA. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3