...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
IAM population, Natufians, Proto-Semitic, North African Component
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by BrandonP: [qb] I hope so, but IIRC, that sample was described as being related to Iberomaurisians. I do think Iberomaurusians and other ancient Maghrebis had some Afroasiatic-related ancestry, but I will admit that all the various characterizations of ANA confuse me. Some make it sound like an upstream relative of Basal Eurasian, while others treat it as being closer to sub-Saharan ancestries. Possibly, it’s somewhere on the continuum between sub-Saharans on one end and OOA on the other, but it might be too upstream to be the kind of ancestry we’re interested in. That is to say, it could have “gotten off the bus” after the sub-Saharans but before the Egyptians. [/qb][/QUOTE]According to the fst distance that Antalas cited they aren't as close as many believe. [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/4X5NYGu.jpg[/IMG] The distance between IM Moroccans and Natufians are about the same as Nigerians and Biaka Pygmies of Cameroon. [IMG]https://i.ibb.co/tzR3qT4/Biaka-Snip.png[/IMG] and the same distance can be found between ancient Mota of Ethiopia and modern Ethiopians [IMG]https://i.ibb.co/ynYYvPc/Mota-Snip2.png[/IMG] What this suggests to me is a more distant ancestry between the target population and the others. [IMG]https://images2.imgbox.com/73/a5/iMX4dl5Y_o.png[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3