...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
IAM population, Natufians, Proto-Semitic, North African Component
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tazarah: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [qb] Language and population are two different entities that are related but not synonymous. I tried to explain this to Tarazah who identifies E-M215 in Southwest Asia with Semitic yet most Semitic speakers today carry J. This shows that languages can be transferred without genes. This is why the majority of English speakers in the world today have NO English that is Anglo-Saxon ancestry. [/qb][/QUOTE]First of all, I did not identify anything. Actual geneticists identified it and I simply referenced their work. Secondly, I never claimed that language had to be transferred with genes. I argued that proto-semitic speakers would have been the biological ancestors of the Hebrews and Israelites and I referenced papers to show it. According to the Biblical narrative (and common sense), Shem, the ancestor of the Hebrews and Israelites, would have been apart of the same bloodline that was responsible for the creation of the semitic languages. Yes, millions of people speak english today but that does not mean they are descendants of the original and native english speakers. That is the exact point I have been making when it comes to semitic languages. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3