...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Asar Imhotep's book Nsw.t Bjt.j
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Fourty2Tribes: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Khepera9evolution: NO ONE SAYS THAT COPTIC AND MIDDLE EGYPTIAN ARE THE EXACT SAME THING. TO MAKE AN ARGUMENT THAT COPTIC AND M-E AREN'T THE SAME IS REDUNDANT TO BEGIN WITH. IN HIS BOOK HE CLEARLY SAYS THAT THE COPTS DON'T LOOK LIKE THE OLDER "RMTW" IN APPEARANCE. HE SAYS THAT SIMILARITIES IN COPTIC AND OTHER EGYPTIAN LANGUAGES CAME FROM FOREIGNERS LIVING SIDE BY SIDE WITH EGYPTIAN SPEAKERS ENOUGH TO MAKE RESEARCHERS >>THINK<< THAT COPTIC IS THE LAST STAGE OF EGYPTIAN. ITS A LIE AND HISTORICALLY INACCURATE WHICH IS WHY HE CAN'T SHOW ANY EVIDENCE OF IT.[/QUOTE]I'm still not seeing how this is even worthy of discussion. Let me clarify... You are saying that Asar is using a redundant argument because everyone knows Coptic is not the language of the MK? That Asar is also redundant because researchers don't believe that Coptic is the last stage of a defacto language? Do you see why I'm confused? I never really looked into it but I always assumed that Egyptology defined Coptic as the last stage of one language with some foreign influence. Thus the only areas where Asar and Mboli are going against the tide is when they say it was already a different language ie Upper and Lower Egypt had different languages simultaneously. That's my issue with the video. Its too passionate about stuff where they are probably wrong. Upper and Lower Egypt probably had different languages because they were different kingdoms with different deities, totems and sciences therewith. [QUOTE] HERE COMES THE FALLACIES. EGYPTOLOGY IS SO ASS BACKWARDS THAT HE USED SEVERAL EGYPTOLOGIST IN HIS BOOK THO. AND STOP WITH CONJECTURE AND MAYBE'S AND WHAT IFS. THE DUDE CREATED HIS OWN DEFINITION AS TO WHAT A DIALECT IS AND THEN CITED HIMSELF.[/QUOTE]Even if we go by the dictionary definition of language and dialect we are probably still dealing with two different languages. [QUOTE] ANOTHER FALLACY. CHECK ASAR'S BIBLIOGRAPHY HE USES PLENTY OF EGYPTOLOGIST [/QUOTE]That means you have to be discerning. Basing analysis on the validity of Greenberg is not being discerning. [QUOTE] SEE HOW YOU IGNORED THAT? THERE'S NO POINT. ITS STUPID TO SAY THAT ALL OF THOSE LANGUAGES WERE SPOKEN AT THE SAME TIME. WHEN ONE SAYS STUFF LIKE EX. BARAK OBAMA AND ABRAHAM LINCOLN PLAYED MADDEN ON PLAYSTATION THAT SHOWS HOW IGNORANT OF HISTORY YOU ARE. [/QUOTE]Just because the name Coptic is new doesn’t mean they weren’t speaking the same language without the foreign influence. Writing in caps does not make you point more clear. [QUOTE] THEY SPOKE DIFFERENT DIALECTS THAT WERE UNDETECTABLE UNTIL THEY STUDIED COPTIC [/QUOTE]Coptic is an indigenous language to Lower Egypt which was a separate nation for thousands of years. Why would they ever speak the same language? Again this is my main issue with the video. It spends too much time on fluff stuff like this in an area where they are probably wrong anyway. [QUOTE] WHAT LOCATION OF WHO? WHAT LANGUAGE EXACTLY? [/QUOTE]I don’t remember the languages. I think it may have been in reference Obenga and other scholars. Its not just Egyptian transliterations. The Greenberg language families are related to each other in ways that seem to contradict the half-ass model. Ethiopia probably isn’t based on anything but a guess. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3