...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Asar Imhotep's book Nsw.t Bjt.j
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Clyde Winters: [QB] This paper https://cloudfront.escholarship.org/dist/prd/content/qt0qt6q69k/qt0qt6q69k.pdf does not really dispute Diop's research. the key to confirming a genetic relationship is regular correspondence, and being able to reconstruct the proto language. Diop met this criterion. The Schuh paper provides 14 alleged terms he claims came from Diop out of hundred. The should have alerted you to the fact that Schuh was out to decieve readers. On page 25 Diop compares Egyptian and Wolof: Egyptian............Wolof i.................. ni mi............. ma ni................. na k..................nga ef................. ef es................. es n..................nanw tn................. ngen sen................ naiw (sen) This illustrates that Shuh is an untrust worthy writer. He wrote the paper you cite with a political intention in mind. A cursory review of the Schuh article before publication would have shown the paper to be unreliable. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3