...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
New Homo sapiens fossil found outside of Africa, from 194 kya
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by capra: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] SMH. Who said Malawi-hora was "EurAsian"? I said MIXED with Eurasian. Meaning "Eurasian" ancestry was deep in Southern Africa BEFORE the Early Neolithic. That is why Skoglund speculated that the ancestral home of the Neolithics was NOT the Near East but somewhere in Africa [IMG]http://i67.tinypic.com/fnaj5z.jpg[/IMG] [/qb][/QUOTE]What you see at K=2 or K=3 is *not* Eurasian admixture, and nobody but you thinks it is. The recent West Eurasian ancestry in Africa can be seen more-or-less at K=6 as the yellow component, and at K=7 as the yellow and part of the red. Once Mota gets his own component there is no more yellow component in Malawi either, so zero evidence of actual Eurasian ancestry. Mota has *no* Eurasian (unless some really ancient unrecognizable kind) according to formal stats. On the other hand, Luxmanda and South_Africa_1200BP *do* have West Eurasian in qpAdm as well as in this ADMIXTURE run at K=6-7. My guess is that Skoglund et al mentioned the PPNB-like ancestry could come from Africa because North Africa is an obvious logical possibility. They sure as hell aren't talking about low K ADMIXTURE components. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3