...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Here we go again. QUEEN NEFERTITI BROUGHT TO LIFE WITH CONTROVERSIAL
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Yatunde Lisa: [qb] But, it is more naturalistic the way Akenaton wanted so I go with the naturalistic as more resembling how he looked. For me, and this is just personal eyeballing, I don't think the mummy looks like Nefertiti the cheekbones and bridge of nose is different however, the reconstruction does resemble the mummy, without despite the skin color and eye color choice which is dubious at best. Now do real humans have long faces? Of course some Fulani men do <removed images> check the previous images I posted, the Armana's are very Nubian influenced, Akenaton is wearing Nubian earring and Nefertiti wears Nubian styled wigs. But in the more regulated early style you don't see that... Akenaton is representing in the Armana style delivering a 3k year postcard with a message it is up to you whether you want to see it or not. [/qb][/QUOTE]Egypt is in Africa. Period. There is nothing symobolic about it. The Amarna style is nothing more than the "African style" of Art as seen throughout Africa in an Egyptian context. The ancient Egyptians were Africans. The only people who DONT see that are the "European experts" whose job it is to deny the fact that Egypt is in Africa and that the AE were indeed Africans with connections to the rest of Africa. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3