...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Here we go again. QUEEN NEFERTITI BROUGHT TO LIFE WITH CONTROVERSIAL
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tyrannohotep: [QB] [URL=http://jakobssonlab.iob.uu.se/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/populationHistory_3A.jpg]Graph on population divergences within African populations, as well as their varying affinities with non-Africans[/URL] Note that even West and Central Africans are less divergent from OOA populations than the Khoisan peoples of South Africa. And East Africans are closer still to OOA. It's been pointed out [i]ad nauseum[/i] here for over half a decade, but Team Afrocentric needs to get away from this obsolete notion that African populations can all be genetically grouped into a singular, exclusive "race" or cluster. Even if you limit your scope to SSA, you'll find certain Africans are genetically closer (i.e. less divergent) to OOA than others. And if you think about it, that shouldn't be a problem for us. It [i]doesn't[/i] mean that the aboriginal inhabitants of North Africa would be less African than Khoisan or West Africans. They'd still be native to the continent, and therefore they'd still appear (phenotypically) "black" to modern casual observers. It's not like their ancestors would have magically turned into Arabs the moment they stepped foot into the Sahara. Hell, if Cheddar Man and other prehistoric Eurasians have shown us anything in the last few years, it's that modern humans didn't even turn pale the moment they crossed the Sinai into Eurasia. You people really are too attached to racialized thinking here. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3