...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
The peopling of the last Green Sahara revealed by high-coverage resequencing of trans
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] If I am reading this correctly. The node should be equivalent to a sub-clade within a uniparental-haplogroup. Still need to digest the paper. HWich means to say if there isn't a geographical pattern then that could mean possible forced migration ala slavery or something similar. That is why it is imperative we look at these things within a geographical context. And ignore the BS "slavery" or "back-migration' lies. when I get time. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: ^on E-M2 and R-V88 node is a node does matter where is is geographically located.[/QUOTE]What do you mean? [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3