...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
The peopling of the last Green Sahara revealed by high-coverage resequencing of trans
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] Holy shyte! This paper is a game changer. I am getting problems to post quote because of parenthesis HTML errors I am not done reading but....wow...this is a bomb shell study. It looks like they are exposing the lies. Are they breaking rank? Lol! As I predicted. Are they accusing past researchers of doctoring results and/or hiding information? SMH Are they saying that E-M2 dispersal are from North Africa? This I getting good. He! HE! He! Quote --------------------- "consistent with the tree reported in phase 3 of the 1000 Genomes Project . However, [b]we found 11 subclades (branches 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 79, 81, 82, 95, 98 and 99) which **share no markers** with the 262 E-M2 chromosomes analysed by Poznik and collegues[/b]. It is worth noting that branches 72 and 81 are [b]two deep sister lineages[/b] within the E-M2 main multifurcation and both of them include chromosomes [b]from northern Africa.[/b] Similarly, the other terminal lineages absent in the 1000 Genomes Project’s tree are mainly represented by samples [b]from northern Africa or,[/b] to a lesser extent, from the [b]northernmost regions of sub-Saharan Africa[/b] (i.e. the central Sahel)" [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3