...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancestral heterogeneity of ancient Eurasians
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by beyoku: [QB] @XYYMAN. So I see you are making some progress. Are you ready to admit you Fvcked up and the image you thought “Looked Like” K=4 was the full analysis? And since it WAS the full analysis and you see it included all the populations I mentioned then they were in fact “Part of the analysis” and were “compared”? You also going to go back and admit you are messing up again with the Onge? The component fixed in the Onge, an adamanese Relic Group, is totally different from that which peaks in the Natufian. How you made this mistake is beyond me. You can’t sit and say they didn’t include or compare population X with population Z when BOTH of them are all in the same ADMIXTURE analysis. You do know how admixture works right? Tic Toc......where in the article or the supp does it say the ADMIX Run was supervised or unsupervised? Months ago I gave an analysis oscehst is going on in the admixture run and what I Believe to be it’s faults. Be humble. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3