...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Ancestral heterogeneity of ancient Eurasians
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by capra: [QB] the ancestral percentages here are from the autosomes, not based on the haplogroups at all. he is also looking for correlations between the haplogroups and the autosomal ancestry, but that's a separate thing. high proportion of Arabian and West Asian most likely means modern Arabians and West Asians have a lot of ancestry from relatives of Natufians. these CTs just mean "some kind of CT" which could be anything under C, D, E, or F. (so yes it can certainly be East African or pretty much anything.) because of the low coverage of the genome the original authors could not determine whether or not it had mutations for those haplogroups. in principle it could also be some unknown CT* that belongs to none of these, but that is not what it is actually saying. amateurs often look at these genomes using more SNPs and/or less stringent data quality filtres and assign them to more detailed haplogroups (though sometimes not as reliably). in this case genetiker has assigned both of those CT samples to E1b1b like the others, which makes sense. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3