...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Nuclear aDNA Recovery; Sexing of a 4000-Year-Old Egyptian Mummy Head.
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Oshun: [qb] [QUOTE] And again, the underlying point of these studies is to reinforce the notion that there were NEVER any blacks in AE to begin with. So really your theory may sound nice and "objective" but that is not really what these people are ultimately saying. [/QUOTE]But you just answered this supposition. If ancient humans were morphologically black whether they were African or Eurasian, and the southern phenotype was "black" then what does that mean regardless of what DNA you find? If we found out AE were found to be morphologically and genetically Adamanese tomorrow, but not genetically related to modern SSA, what race would that be? [/qb][/QUOTE]Come on with the circular arguments. IF U5 is found in black people in North Africa there are only two options: 1) there was some mixture with Levantines or 2) That DNA is indigenous. Neither 1 or 2 imply that black skin in North Africa is the result of back migrating Eurasians. That it totally absurd and nobody is even claiming this in any of these studies. What they are ACTUALLY saying and what you are saying is two different things. You can try all day to make this sound "objective" and "scientific" but we all know that has absolutely nothing to do with it. If you really pay attention to these folks, the Southerners and Northerners were both white Eurasian in origin in the first place so black skin was a "foreign" entity...... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3