...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
SOY Keita Comments on the "Black Pharaohs" Documentary from PBS
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Ish Gebor: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Fourty2Tribes: [qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: That's the thing. Whenever European scientists or scientists in general use racial labels or terms I always have retain some skeptecism. That Cheddar Man was dark skin is not in doubt but the question was exactly [i]how[/i] dark was he?? Was he dark enough to be truly labeled as "black". Recall the genetic findings of the 7,000 year old La Brana hunter-gatherer showing them to have dark skin and blue eyes, yet nobody except Afronuts were quick to call them "black". [/QUOTE]Afronuts have no problem calling a spade a spade. [QUOTE] I mean unlike Egyptian mummies whose intact skins were subject to melanin dosage tests and found to be "packed with melanin", we only have bones of the Old European hunter gatherers and remnant DNA with autosomes showing they didn't have the mutation for pale skin. The reason for my skepticism is that I'm aware that European academia now has for lack of a better phrase, a "left wing" bias based on multiculturalism in a way as to proclaim a black or even Muslim presence in early Europe. [/qb][/QUOTE]Real liberals and not sobs like Doug Weller have no problem calling a spade a spade too. Weller is the dude who brags about marching with MLK while censoring King Tut's ancestry test on wikipedia. Its racist people, typically those classified as white who will try to tell you someone with the same pigment genes as brown and black humans are just dark skin, swarthy and/or olive when they are not located in their black race regions. [/QUOTE][QUOTE] Lalueza-Fox states: [b]"However, the biggest surprise was to discover that this individual possessed African versions in the genes that determine the light pigmentation[/b] of the current Europeans, which indicates that he had dark skin, although we can not know the exact shade." [/QUOTE] https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/01/140126134643.htm [QUOTE] "This individual had the African variants for the pigmentation genes." [/QUOTE] https://www.ndtv.com/offbeat/this-is-how-europeans-looked-7-000-years-ago-548938 [QUOTE][i]The mixture of African and European traits implies that the racial transformation of modern humans was still in progress long after they left Africa, with changes in eye colour coming before alterations in skin tone.[/i] Study leader Professor Carles Lalueza-Fox, of the Institute of Evolutionary Biology in Barcelona, said: [b]‘The biggest surprise was to discover that this individual possessed African versions in the genes that determine the light pigmentation of the current Europeans. [/b] [/QUOTE] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2546421/Blue-eyed-caveman-7-000-year-old-DNA-reveals-European-African-traits.html [/qb][/QUOTE]If OOA is accurate then all human diversity is a result of human migrations out of Africa and adaptations to various environments around the world. Therefore, the farther you go back in any population the more it should converge on an "African" phenotype. OOA is something that came out of "mainstream" science. The problem is that the European model of human history still promotes the concept that Europe is the basis of human diversity in phenotype AND the basis of all human advancements in history. Hence a poster about the show "First Man" on curiosity stream which shows a Eurasian female: [IMG]https://i.ytimg.com/vi/55tAIjZu2lM/hqdefault.jpg[/IMG] Eurasians didn't come on the scene until way late and certainly light skin even later. Yet the commercial for the show makes it seem as if light skinned ancient apes turned straight into light skin ancient humans. https://vimeo.com/218190929 I didn't watch the show but this can't be far off what is actually in the program. https://blog.curiositystream.com/archives/1406 But African scholars who point these contradictions out are supposedly bad people. So if the show is first man, why are they talking about Apes? And how on earth do the first humans start in Eurasia when the first humans didn't leave Africa for over 200,000 years after humans were born? So what kind of first humans are they talking about? This was produced by a French team across various Eurasian countries/colonies for primarily a European audience..... go figure. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3