...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Pleistocene North African genomes link Near Eastern and sub-Saharan African human pop
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Fourty2Tribes: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: And even though I personally understand what you're trying to say... I think the way it's communicated is flawed. For instance, statistically in your mind, what are the odds that two populations with completely different histories retain the [b]same[/b] archaic signatures after their respective bottlenecks/drift. [/QUOTE]You kind of lost me. They haven't maintained the the same signatures. Doesnt it range from 2-5.5% OoA isnt and it increases as we go back in time? With African populations the number is 0-0.5% and that number also increases as you go back in time. Where you would estimate the percentages with F4-statistics? Is there a formula for that? I wan't to see if I can predict it. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3