...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Pleistocene North African genomes link Near Eastern and sub-Saharan African human pop
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [QB] [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/YrLZv7J.png[/IMG] [QUOTE]Figure 68.3 Natufian skulls from Eynan (left) and Hayonim cave (right); frontal view. [b]Large morphological variations between sites exist in this population[/b][/QUOTE][URL=https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/quaternary-of-the-levant/human-fossils-from-the-upper-palaeolithic-through-the-early-holocene/8D902B3F1696C9308388463009ECB733]Source[/URL] Large morphological variation (which indicates we're not dealing with a single homogeneous population) and with African phenotypes present means recent admixture, period. If the tools disagree, then the tools have no bearing on reality. Simple as that. As I said on the previous page, no amount of fancy software tools can beat common sense. Whenever they say Natufians don't have African ancestry, remember that it's always these people who say that: [IMG]https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1200/1*k_9gg8L9DL69nn_LyM_k0Q.gif[/IMG] No understanding of archaeology, bioanthropology or anything. Just a bunch software dabblers online running computer software. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3