...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Pleistocene North African genomes link Near Eastern and sub-Saharan African human pop
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] There was no "back-migration of mtDNA U from Europe to Africa. It never happened!!! [/qb][/QUOTE]True. U didn't migrate from Europe to Africa. It was U6. I used to think U6 originated in AME (Africa & Mid-East). Two years ago Rumanian 35k U6 was found. U6 is E Euro in origin per known physical remains but not "Caucasian" as per Maca Meyer. U6 ←U ←R ←N ←L3. L3 born in Africa N born in AME R born in Eurasia U born in Eurasia U6 born in Europe U6a'b'd'c born in Africa. U6's generational offspring are considered not just northern African but a Maghrebi Imazighen ('Berber' speakers) marker. This makes for low level female genetic continuity from before the last Ice Age to the present in the Maghreb al Aqsa. Birth and at least 20,000 years residence make[i] U6 downstream clades[/i] indigenous African. Geneticist reports are in consensus for U6a'b'd' all being born in the Maghreb. U6c seems questionable. Tschad? Canaries? U6a1 was born further east somewhere between Libya and Sudan. I feel sorry for people paying Skippy for a so-called African Ancestry test. Skippy labels U6a1 European, a blatant error. But then relying on Skippy for accurate Africana is a well known stupidity marked by fear of independent thought. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3