...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Irish: Predynastic Hierakonpolis crania have Eurasian affinity
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] You cannot exclude U6 from what's hi-lited in your post. U6b is 28000 years old. That corresponds to near the end of a lush monsoon period. U6b was in the Maghreb proper 10000 years before the last Ice Age. It was part of the inception of Maurusians as much as any local Aterian female haplogroups. It had to be a Maghrebi Upper Paleolithic later Aterian female component. Maybe in eastern parts since the middle Dabban too. U6a is even older, 35000 years, contemporaneous with the mid-Upper Paleolithic Aterians and the earlier Dabban. The climate was hyper arid. The vast majority of people followed the retreating monsoon grasslands southward movement toward equatorial Africa, eg., Panga ya Saidi, Kenya (no Saharan pump but Monsoon fluctuation effected mid-Holocene and all earlier major population movements over all the continent. The Sahara is nobody's pump, it's a sponge saturated then wrung dry by the West African Monsoon rainpump cyclic advance and retreat). The momma of U6a and U6b is 42000 years old, in an earlier stage of the Arid Maximum above. It's the tail end of the early Upper Paleolithic Aterian and the very beginning of the Dabban. U6c is much younger, 12000 years old. Immediately after the last LGAM. It's Holocene not Pleistocene like U6 and U6a&b are. The parent of U6a&b and U6c is 47000 years old, just 3000 years after the rise of U6. It's a lush Monsoon Optimum period. Aterian's been going on since the preceeding Middle Palaeolithic but the Dabban won't even exist for another 5000 years. 3000 years after coalescing then further splitting for 47000 years thereafter, all in Africa, NW Africa more but not exclusively in particular, is indigenous for me. At least that's my opinion. I'm sure there are more. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Doug M: [qb] Whether or Not Haplogroup U originated in Africa, it is was not always present and was not dominant in all of North Africa. It is present in some remains but does not represent all lineages present over time in the past. This is just one part of a larger puzzle not all of it. The significance of Haplogroup U is it represents the expansions of people into Europe after the last ice age. Determining where it originated helps understand how long ago U existed and where it spread and how it spread. [URL=http://u]But other than that there were other haplogroups already present in Africa and populations there who predate the Ice Age and were present after the ice age with different DNA lineages.[/URL] Likewise, the U6 found in ancient Romania matches no known population of modern Eurasians. [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3