...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Irish: Predynastic Hierakonpolis crania have Eurasian affinity
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Elmaestro: [QB] [QUOTE][qb]Originally posted by Tukuler: [/qb] If you think they're the same please forget about my schemata. Indigenous modified by foreigners can in no way be foreigners absorbing some of the local stock. Reservation Indians with some Euro blood are not the same as non-reservation Euros with Indian blood who used 1/16th to take over tribal rule of indigenees. Any 'Africans' significantly closer to 'Eurasians' than they are to any and every indigenous African people are not indigenous African. They are foreigners living in Africa absorbing to limited levels some indigenous stock. If say 5000 years passes since a peoples' inception to nearly complete abandon of their place of birth, and they thrive and expand for say 25000 years someplace elsewhere thoroughly infusing with who may be there then, or if no one else is there, they can be considered indigenous. Let me remove the alpha suffixes. Do not take the dots or one dimensional plane referencing literally. nor is there any significance in the quantity of AFR's, nor does position suggest root or age. Imagine the AFR's in a circle if you must. imagine Eura a circle of various Eura's. Imagine the _ some kind of fuzzy border (genetic and whatever) between AFR's and Eura's. AFR . AFR . AFR . AFR _ afr . Eura (afr looks like a Eura in Africa mating with Africans AFR . AFR . AFR . AFR . afr _ Eura (afr looks like a African who may a Eura relationship more intense than any other AFR Maybe I should give up trying to illustrate the different ways I interpret the statement 'african closer to eurasian than african' since everybody other than me knows what it means without confusion. Whatever that statement means to whoever; [b] For me[/b], a people in Africa significantly closer by genetic criteria to non-Africans is simply a non- African people residing in Africa. Such folk are not African. No prehistoric one drop can make them anymore African than the Afrikaaners who went to the USA to claim legal benefits as African Americans. [/QUOTE]I'm half way with you, heres the thing.... https://bit.ly/2sjRwbi [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/RFyKFVv.png?1[/IMG] Imagine an African version of this guy residing in North Africa. Surely He isn't a Native American residing in china. So the possibility that significant Eurasian can be represented in a resident African is there... but to which extent are they truly Eurasian? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3