...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Was Nat Geo claiming an African origin for haplogroup C?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] To Sage's question, this is agreement Amarna analysis. With certain genetic material pre-dominant in Khoi_San and Mbuti being present the Amarnas. That is why the [URL=http://i]brown component is so high in Somalis and Southern African looking at the Abusir mummies[/URL]. [/qb][/QUOTE]Like I said, I never looked into Mbuti or Click speakers as far as the prehistoric Lower Nile Valley goes. So I appreciate the lesson you all are teaching me. 'STR'ing the Amarna's revealed some Mbuti and Biaka Shorty predominant alleles. There were alleles shared between Amarnas and San but pretty much pan-African. That informed layman K4-13 STRUCTURE graph indicated a San component in Natufians but it had no Shorty samples. I'd like to look into this brown you're talking about. Please cite. Thx. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3