...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Peabody Museum and Harvard African Studies Papers now online
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by sudaniya: [QB] I have read some posts from both Swenet and Beyoku (in Forumbiodiversity) and you guys are encouraging people to read up on OOA material in order to avoid being hoodwinked. Beyoku also mentioned that there were Natufian-type people in Sudan and Dinka-type (Nilotic) people in Egypt at certain points -- which is something I did not know. Swenet also mentioned (in Forumbiodiversity) that he thinks Mtdna M1 gradually decreased during the Dynastic period. This must also be true for Y-DNA Em-78. Haplo J must have had a gradual increase in the Dynastic period. It would be great if tests were carried out to determine when Y-DNA J became so pronounced in Egypt. It's been pointed out that if the Y-DNA profiles of the Abusir mummies was as equally Eurasian as the mtdna, then people could conclude that the Abusir mummies were foreign derived migrants. It seems nore than likely that the Abusir mummies were Egyptians, but there had been a gradual change in Egypt that explains their genetic profile. Authorities in modern Egypt have samples of Old Kingdom ancient Egyptians in their keep and should have no problem releasing the data if the Old Kingdom Egyptians are just as Eurasian (maternally) as the Abusir mummies. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3