...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
ElMaestro was correct - The Abusir dataset is manipulated
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [QB] No insult intended young man but because you ask that question tells me you don't fully understand how this thing works. Yes, CODIS STR is still used by Police Agencies around the world. Not Autosomal SNPs ie affinity through frequency. Why? Linkage disequilibrium (LD)! STR not SNP will assign population affinity. That is why the STR was removed from the Abusir. We seem to forget some modern Europeans are 80% African based upon UNSUPERVISED SNP analysis. 80%!!!! In other words if the computers are NOT tricked into removing African DNA Europeans are 80% African. One of the few methods to "separate" Africans from Europeans is through CODIS STRs . That is why the Amarna came back African and not European. If SNPS are used then there is TreeMix or some sort of "filtering" software to determine ancestral population. I have no doubt if SNPs were used instead of CODIS STRs the Amarnas will also come out as "Eurasian" just as the Abusir. anyone can do it.. [IMG]https://i.postimg.cc/SNpGw9j9/genome-view-link.jpg[/IMG] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tyrannohotep: [qb] OP, is it your argument that the Abusir el-Meleq mummies would appear more sub-Saharan if the CODIS STRs were included? Do you think STRs have more say on biological affinity than the other genetic data they used? [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3