...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Max Planck, Harvard and Sao Paulo researchers deny their DNA models are suspect
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [QB] [b]You're neglecting forensics in favor of antiblack bias[/b]. Your response is nonsequitor. It's YOU assuming a simplistic 'either or' scenario and confusing color for features. Strike it from the record and still it remains in jurors minds. This is what I said. the Ainu phenotype, Amerind genotype, Ancient One the Oceania phenotype, East Asian genotype, Luzia rep early First Americans despite bigotted racial expectations. Special pleading what black is. Omg 😱 Ha ha, ho ho, hee hee rotflmrbao You ytes love doing that yet you have no doubts what a yellow or a white looks like from face bones. Forensic racial anthropology, not you, defines what black yellow and white are. Nonmetrics makes Luzia an Oceanic type. All your wishology can't change face bone facts and you studied anthropology in university so I cant believe you don't know better. Do I hafta post the ballistics? [b]Karen Ramey Burns[/b] [i]Forensic Anthropology Training Manual[/i] Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc (2013) pp 222-238 Black is color not phenotype. negroid mongoloid caucasoid are phenotypes not colors. Same for australoid, etc. Stop trying to confuse people that negroid and black are synonymous. They aren't. There are dark, if no black, caucasoids. There are yellow, white, and black mongoloids. It don't matter what you do or don't call black. I'm talking phenotype not color. Luiza was an australoid/oceanic phenotype by skull and we know the range of soft tissue traits that properly apply. Doesn't matter if she was as black as a Melanesian or white as a northern Mongolian. That's not the issue so don't sidetrack with colour distraction. And don't act like Luzia eclipses the Ancient One. Again, no 'either or' simplicities Reconstructors' racial bias is evident. Examine Luzia's skull between forehead and base of nose. The new version flat out invents a brow and nasal bridge unseen on the skull. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tyrannohotep: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [qb]Unbiased science must accept the fact [URL=http://y]there were once East Asians who looked like today's Oceania blacks[/URL] and that [URL=http://y]they crossed to the Americas via Beringia too[/URL]. "Time alone oh time will tell" if anthropology will neglect forensics in reconstruction to favor anti-'negroid' racism. We've seen it happen to the Grimaldi mother and child and to the Iwo Eleru fossil all in support of the insane "no negroes until after 4000 BCE" anthro dogma. [/qb][/QUOTE]I don't doubt for a moment that the ancestors of all eastern non-African populations (including East Asians and Native Americans) would still have been dark-skinned ("black") people. However, if one of the papers Djehuti cited earlier is right that ancestral Native Americans went through a standstill in Beringia for several millennia prior to moving into North and South America, I would assume they had already evolved a certain level of depigmentation and other Arctic adaptations that their descendants would have inherited. The same could probably be said of their brethren in northeastern Asia who went on to evolve into the modern Chinese, Japanese, Mongolians, Austronesians, etc. I don't know if the first Native Americans would have arrived still [URL=http://y]looking like what[/URL] you and [URL=http://y][b]I[/b] would call "black" in terms of soft-tissue traits[/URL].[/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3