...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Max Planck, Harvard and Sao Paulo researchers deny their DNA models are suspect
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Tukuler: [qb] Thx 4/t precision. Just skim reading I got an erroneous impression of PopY re Surui and Kariwhatchacallems, hahaha. Man, something funny's going on. It's Anglocentrics assuming superiority over LusoHispanics and Francophones. We already know about it in Afr iron dating. But check LusoHispanic scientists on S Amer artifacts bonfied at 18,000 yrs old and, maybe not as strongly vetted, up to 40,000 yr old tools/camps. I tink Tyranno brought up MSA split of E Asia and Oceania types from common roots. Now there's this minor sporadic unexplained West Oceania signal in the Americas. Hmm. I had abandoned xPacific peopling which you still entertain but now I question Beringia only entrance of Hss into the W Hemisphere. Is there any archaeo backing up Beringia habitation that Anglos insist is a fact while denying widespread preClovis S Amer the LusoHispans uncovered? The more I learn The less I know [/qb][/QUOTE]Whether it is Anglocentrics or Latinocentrics (including Portuguese speakers) they are all forms of the same Eurocentric superiority complex. As Lioness pointed out the whole debacle of 'Luzia's People' not really looking austric was not the claims of the scientists but of the Brazilian media. So the bias problem is far more extensive than just the science and academia but the media as well. I forgot to add to my last post that mt hg D1 was also found in Asia but interestingly enough among Jomon as explained [URL=http://www.egyptsearch.com/forums/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic;f=8;t=010142]here[/URL]. Thus, the Jomon may very well be somewhat of a missing link between Asians and Paleo-American ancestors. That said, my Pacific Island hopping theory is not a straight across the Pacific but rather is something intermediate to that and the Beringian theory. physical anthropologist Walter Neves and geneticist Pontus Skoglund postulate that due to the stereotypical tropical features of Luzia and her like as well as the Population Y signal, it is probable that the migration route may have taken place around the northern Pacific rim either along the Beringian coastline or just south of it along a chain of islands. As for Beringian archaeology it is quite scant no doubt to Beringia now being submerged but it still exist on both sides of the Bering Strait. Earlier in this thread I already cited one study from last year on late Pleistocene infants in Alaska [URL=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature25173]here[/URL]. There is another study from a couple months back on Holocene baby teeth in northeastern Siberia [URL=https://www.cam.ac.uk/research/news/dna-from-31000-year-old-milk-teeth-leads-to-discovery-of-new-group-of-ancient-siberians?ucam-ref=read-this-next]here[/URL]. The problem however is that I think too much emphasis is placed on Siberian populations and not enough on coastal East Asian populations of that time i.e. Population Y. [b]Ice Age Beringia[/b] [IMG]https://www.nps.gov/common/uploads/stories/images/nri/20150811/articles/332BAABC-E6ED-48DF-DCDD78FA0CA4C1F7/332BAABC-E6ED-48DF-DCDD78FA0CA4C1F7.jpg[/IMG] [b]Possible Prehistoric Migration Routes[/b] [IMG]http://prairiehotrods.pbworks.com/f/1213296878/beringia.gif[/IMG] [b]Probable Prehistoric Migration routes suggested by physical remains and DNA[/b] [IMG]https://www.sciencenews.org/sites/default/files/main/articles/ti_first-americans_feat_free1.jpg[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3