...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Interview: Dr. Shomarka Keita
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Asar Imhotep: [QB] If you read what I actually said I did not say that YOU made the claim in 2017, I stated that this notion of a pale-skin gene has been published at least three years ago in a scientific journal, which he reads. So did the people in the Science journal plagiarize you also? Can you point us to your non-egyptsearch.com website posting on the matter, where everyone who has published on this finding got their information from you? Secondly, this interview was a general interview, an introduction of him to my audience. It wasn't meant to be a deep dive into anything as the conversation would be 5 hours long trying to explain everything to the lay person. As I stated in a previous post, this was sort of last minute. We decided to do this on Sunday for Tuesday morning. So there was no time to put presentations together to have an in-depth conversation about any particular topic. The "Africans took near Easterners as Concubines" was in the context of explaining how the "near eastern" markers got into that area, because it is a known weaver's town. Those of us who actually read mdw-nTr texts and study this history knows this. But this is not known to the general public. This I discuss as well in Aaluja Vol. II (2020), last chapter. It was enough to make the point for the general lay audience. And regarding the three samples, do you really think that it took you, of all people, to point out that it was only three samples? You have lost your mind. We all read the primary article and came to the same conclusion, not because it took great analytical skills, because they said so directly in the paper. Doesn't take a genius. I belong to several different circles and we all knew this, and discussed this on several different platforms, without any engagement from you. You place more value on your egyptsearch conversations than there really is. If you want to be taken seriously, go publish somewhere in a journal and defend your position against people in the field. No one is going to cite egyptsearch for a conversation in which you are simply reciting other scholar's published arguments any way. Get over yourself. [QUOTE]Originally posted by xyyman: [qb] ^ I not going to get into it with you. Not worth my time. Believe what you may. And I made that claim since 2007 not 2017. Anyways - I don't think he handled the Abusir question adequately which makes me think he is hedging or pandering. His argument should be a deep dive on the mtDNA haplogroups proving an African origin(eg PhyloTree) rather than "Africans took near Easterners as Concubines". BS pandering by Keita. He mentioned "3". Most people here did not understand it was only 3 samples they used to make their conjecture until I made that point. Is Keita another conman? Plagiarism ? Maybe. Also He was partly educated at Oxford? Unusual. hmmm. [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3