...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
18th dynast were haplogroup R1b/K?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by One Third African: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] If you want to continue this you can figure out if the designation was correct in the first place. You can use Y-STR tools and see if the answer they give is consistent with V88 or M269. If it indeed turns out to be R1b1a2-V8, and if you want to continue, you can use D'Anastasio's supplemental tree and [URL=https://www.yfull.com/arch-3.16/tree/R1b/]yfull[/URL], to see if R1b1a2-V8 has Egyptian members in modern Egypt, or if all the V88 in modern Egypt is non-V8. Needless to say, if modern Egyptians have V8, it becomes much more convincing that Tut also had it. But this all makes or breaks with whether the party (iGENEA?) who first announced Tut's lineage as 'R1b1a2', was correct in naming it that. If that person was not correct, or used some dated nomenclature (maybe in 2005 R1b-M269 was called R1b1a2), it doesn't matter that ISOGG had R1b1a2 as V88 in 2010. Simple investigations like this is how you can get way ahead of anyone talking in opinions and hypotheticals. [/qb][/QUOTE]I entered the alleles listed by iGENEA into [URL=https://www.nevgen.org/]NevGen[/URL] and got R1b, but nothing more specific than that (i.e. I could not tell whether it was V88, M269, or something else). But given that iGENEA got their data from what could have been stock footage on a Discovery documentary, these may not necessarily be the alleles Tut etc. actually had. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3