...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
18th dynast were haplogroup R1b/K?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Swenet: [qb] @lioness Yes, that is what you have to do. Use ISOGG and work with convention in mind. What that means, is that when you talk about R1b1a2 and relate it to V88, you have to avoid creating the impression that V88 has always been and will be linked to R1b1a2, and that iGENEA are pulling a fast one for not realizing this. Don't get it mistaken. When wiki says V88 is R1b1a2, it's also just provisional. Do not think that because you benefit from a more updated R1b tree, that R-V88 = R1b1a2 is settled and that it's only iGENEA that is behind. This is also why I say it's not a matter of correct or incorrect. A lot is subject to change even today, and no one is going to go back to their old posts and update dated haplogroup nomenclature. [/qb][/QUOTE]what do you think of in 2020 iGENEA saying Tutankhamun's DNA is M269? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3