...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
"Are All Africans Genetically North African"
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BrandonP: [QB] I looked at [URL=https://revoiye.com/the-breakdown-are-we-all-genetically-north-african/]revoiye's "Breakdown" post[/URL], and there's something about their methodology that seems a bit suspect to me. [IMG]https://i1.wp.com/revoiye.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Normascheme.dot_.png?w=720&ssl=1[/IMG] [QUOTE](O) would be ASW as indicated in a previous post, here represented by Mbuti, (C) would be ASA represented by the samples of Ballitobay, [qb](A) would be ANA1 a population more closest to ANA’s progenitors and represented by the non “basal” ancestry in Mota. (B) would be ANA2 represented by the non Eurasian portion of Taforalt[/qb], (X) would be West Eurasians represented by Sunghnir IV and (Y) would represent an early East Eurasian represented by the earliest Hoabinhian sample.[/QUOTE]What grounds do they have for assuming Mota's "non-basal" ancestry would form a clade with Taforalt's indigenous African ancestry to the exclusion of OOA groups? I would have thought the phylogeny would look more like this: [IMG]https://i.imgur.com/mgW2mO6.jpg[/IMG] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3