...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Population Y, the real First Americans?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] ^ Yes, Lioness thank you for quoting the sources I already provided the links to. Notwithstanding individual outliers, the problem is that most American paleo-archaeological finds are associated with post-Clovis cultures and all these remains predominantly show super-sinodonty and not simply sinodonty which is consistent with the Beringian Stand-Still Hypothesis and is in stark contrast to sundadonty. Very few are associated with pre-Clovis cultures and Brandon simply cites pre-Clovis evidence of footprints with no human remains. Most evidence of Sundadonty comes from South America Sutter's 2009 [URL=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/48514779_Prehistoric_Population_Dynamics_in_the_Peruvian_Andes]paper[/URL] shows: [i] Although many of these scholars have implied that the second migratory event constituted replacement of the preexisting proto-Mongoloid populations, Joseph Powell and Walter Neves (1999) correctly point out that many of the detected patterns may be due to the initial population structure of the colonists. Using the same traits and protocol adopted by Turner, I have previously argued (Sutter 1997, 2005) that the geographic and temporal trends for dental trait data among twelve prehistoric south-central Andean mortuary populations indicate there were at least two peopling events for the region: an early migration, represented by the Paleoindians and their descendants, followed by a more recent demographic expansion of food-producing populations. Based on a limited number of samples and currently available osteological and dental data from North and Central America, I suggested that the more recent demographic expansion initially had its source among prehistoric food-producing Central Americans, who then expanded south into South America and mixed with the preexisting foraging populations. For this study, I report on epigenetic tooth cusp and root traits for forty-four prehistoric Andean mortuary samples. These data are examined in order to under-stand the factors responsible for the observed dental trait variability and to place these samples in a broader evolutionary context.[/i] This could only mean that the Americas were settled in more than one wave and that Beringia could not be the only source. What's interesting is that a more recent wave of sundadonts entered the Americas as shown by not only Minnesota Woman (c. 5947–5931 BC) but also [URL=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kennewick_Man]Kennwick Man (c. 7,000-6,900 BC)[/URL] [IMG]https://newsroom.uw.edu/sites/default/files/styles/featured_thumbnail/public/kennewick_man.jpg?itok=-hOZ-1AT&c=d63dd9d652c5d16cc731c64fe87257c9[/IMG] [i]Powell said that [b]dental analysis showed the skull to have a 94-percent consistency with being of a Sundadont group like the Ainu and Polynesians and only a 48-percent consistency with being of a Sinodont group like that of North Asia.[/b][24][page needed] Powell said analysis of the skull showed it to be "unlike American Indians and Europeans".[24][page needed] Powell concluded that the remains were "clearly not a Caucasoid unless Ainu and Polynesians are considered Caucasoid"[/i] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3