...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Population Y, the real First Americans?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by the lioness,: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Djehuti: [QB] ^ You need to improve your reading comprehension. Brandon's source correctly points out that Population Y were NOT Australian Aborigines but a people [i]related[/i] to them. [/QUOTE]I think you just don't want to go reading articles Where is a specific individual in the Americas who has DNA that points to all this emphasis on Australians rather than just being part of a broader Asian gene pool of which they are also a part? The blog article has a picture of an Australian and mentions Australians 12 times (not Australo-Melanesian, not Chinese, not Taiwanese etc) Why are Australians singled out rather than a broader Asian gene pool? Based on what specimen? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3