...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Population Y, the real First Americans?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by BrandonP: [QB] Since lioness in her latest post seems to be writing off the "Australasian"/Pop Y signal in Native South Americans as the result of recent Polynesian admixture, [URL=https://www.nature.com/articles/nature14895]one of the studies cited in my OP article[/URL] actually rules that scenario out. [QUOTE]The geographic distribution of the shared genetic signal between South Americans and Australasians cannot be explained by post-Columbian African, European or Polynesian gene flow into Native American populations. If such gene flow produced signals strong enough to affect our statistics, our statistics would show their strongest deviations from zero for African, European or Polynesian populations, which is not observed. For example, [qb]a direct test is significant in showing that the Surui-specific ancestry component is genetically closer to the Andamanese Onge than to Tongans from Polynesia.[/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3