...
Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
register
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
EgyptSearch Forums
»
Egyptology
»
Was E1b1b Brought Back Into Africa via Arab Invasion?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message Icon:
Message:
HTML is not enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Big O: [QB] ^^^ Slim Jim The evidence for my argument is ALREADY sufficient. With aDNA still in it's infancy, such results would simply be "icing on the cake". Nonetheless we have a pound cake, so we don't need icing. Firstly you have presented UNSORCED charts to create doubt on my argument with NO CONTEXT. What charts are you possibly talking about? None the less remember not all NC groups had left Northeast Africa during the initial invasions around the 6th century BC. The Wolof and some other groups (Diop's people) for example detail remaining in Egypt until the Arab invasion. The map by Alfred M M'Imanyara captions the Bantu home with; "Original homeland of the Bantu up to 1500 A.D Dark shading: Possible ultimate origin of the Bantu Cross shading: Area of Bantu expansion into Kemet" Saying that even after the time of Columbus NC speakers were leaving Northern - Northeast Africa. So while we see that late-modern Egyptians do not share primary affinity at all with early Egyptians there may still be some remnants of the NC speaker in the region (hence the E-M2 still in Upper Egypt to this date). Despite those remnants however Late Dynastic - Modern Egyptians are consistently shown to be distinct from Early-Pre Dynastic. Howell's omission is all that we need to validate that fact. Keep in mind that your study from Kemp posted shows Bantu's grouping with Dynastic - Pre Dynastic Kham ahead of Late or modern Egyptians who group with Europeans. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
Contact Us
|
EgyptSearch!
(c) 2015 EgyptSearch.com
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3